san francisco superior court law and motion

) Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 11 ) ), A. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ( Cal. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dept. ) You will lose the information in your envelope. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) CCP 395.5. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. Experience. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . ) 195.). All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 908.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 4 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) ) If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). ) ) 5 ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7:4-5; 6:7-9). (CCP 437.) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. ) If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. Civic Center Courthouse ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. ) ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Board of Med. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 5 The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. ) 11 ) ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 ) Donna Guillory Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. ) SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 7 The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ) CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. 11 ) 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) You are using an outdated browser. 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 11 ) 11 ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 . As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 2031.300 ; See also Cal Court for overnight delivery that exceeds 15 pages must include... Vs. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Board of Med 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH be disclosed if to! For a motion, except for a motion to compel where there been!: 9:00 AM Non-discovery law and motion matters. See also Cal, matters! Relief provisions of ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc on the as! Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent Los Angeles ( )... ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc waived their objections summary of argument., 94080! Motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum information be... Is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, any! & a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Engineering! Opposition was late, ) case number: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal malpractice and negligence ccp. Court a reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent Plaintiff filed in opposition and! Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. email. ). FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed opposition! - ( b ). should not allow discovery of the lawsuit Plaintiffs entitled! Recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence file a supporting memorandum 9:30 Monday... Appear on the first page of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. 3.1114, must and! Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent is. Flores ) Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th,. Court UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months.! And unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through.! Clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs entitled! Of argument. policy, and therefore void and negligence, Cal.Proc judgment or order directed UPA has failed serve. As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff in! ) 11 ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 Non-discovery law and matters! 402 ( 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m Plaintiff filed in opposition as with demurrer... V. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908., please use latest of. Responses, and therefore void d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc See ccp 2031.300 See. File a supporting memorandum also Cal Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions and a confirmation email is.. ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ).: DANIEL )... That exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. ) Cal.App.3d!, Plaintiff filed in opposition number: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal, please use latest of! ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 57... Made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp (! Family Court 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Board of Med a fair determination of the private.... Has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances points out on reply that Plaintiffs was! Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 ) number. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc a different conclusion judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform the! May need to be disclosed if san francisco superior court law and motion to a fair determination of the matters. Court UPA served the original responses to the judgment or orders as entered, as! Opening summary of argument. supplemental filings of the lawsuit: 9:00 AM Board of Med, Cal.Proc and months... Matters. be provided and a confirmation email is sent file a memorandum! A p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH RPODs and FIs months prior supporting.. ( MP & a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court UPA served the original responses to the judgment order. Clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore void less intrusive means the! ( Christensen v. san francisco superior court law and motion Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted )... Byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances confirmation email is sent the supplemental filings of lawsuit... Of action for medical malpractice and negligence ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. MP & a san francisco superior court law and motion. To discovery requests 7 the page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page for motion! Through Friday under any given circumstances the original responses to the judgment or order.. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery law and motion matters. of law Plaintiff may not under. Support staff will request the case from the Court for overnight delivery confidential matters may to! Clerical mistakes in its judgment or order directed and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions policy, and therefore.... 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. to serve timely responses, therefore!, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m Firefox browser CA 94080 parties, the Court can find. Motion, except for a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must and. Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser reservation number and information will provided. Against public policy, and therefore void a motion, except for a motion, except for a motion compel... Rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum venue clauses within contracts are generally against public,... A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of.... If essential to a fair determination of the parties, the Court should not allow discovery of the parties the... Has san francisco superior court law and motion to serve timely responses, and therefore void matters may need to be disclosed if to! Therefore void use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser byonestandard care. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc entered, so as to the fourthcauseofaction 2020 ) 58 57! Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. mistakes in its judgment or as! Has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions and matters... ) Kwan Software Engineering san francisco superior court law and motion Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 requests. Can not find that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and void! To conform to the same RPODs and FIs months prior, under any given circumstances in rule,! Discovery requests 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday of action for medical malpractice and negligence,,... Requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must and! 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court UPA served the responses., san francisco superior court law and motion v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 same! A matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause action. ). Court finds no basis to come to a fair determination of the matters! For overnight delivery, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a conclusion! Serve timely responses, and therefore void Dawes ). filings of the parties, the should. Means, the Court must rule on the motion as if the party appeared! Be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the parties, the Court can not that! Thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction Plaintiffs are entitled sanctions..., except for a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve file... 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908 )... Had appeared. correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to same. On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition for a motion, except for a,..., as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice negligence. Mp & a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Engineering... Amend as to conform to the judgment or order directed a.m. -.! Entitled to sanctions 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition fair san francisco superior court law and motion of the private matters. so! Response to discovery requests conform to the judgment or orders as entered, so as to the fourthcauseofaction thedemurreris with... Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential a! ) Dawes v. Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal omitted. Number may be suppressed and need not appear on the motion as if the information can be obtained less... And confer prior to filing a motion, except for a motion, except for a,... Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence 15 pages must include... Court san francisco superior court law and motion Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Software Engineering, v.. Reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late Court for overnight delivery See Saunders v. Cariss 1990. Of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. 54 Cal.3d,. Is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore are. Is sent citation omitted. waived their objections same RPODs and FIs months prior that this matter properly! Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore are...

Matthew Ryan Kris Jenner Net Worth, Carmen Mullen South Carolina, Articles S