santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 4 TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Background CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 25 I. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. . However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Footnote 19: Defendants. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. http://www.scsCourt.org V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 50, inclusive, Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through 12 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Where appearance has been requested or invited by 6. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 16 vs. 4 Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 3 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. This is a lemon law case. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 720 9th Street system. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, a.) 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 4. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Footnote 15: ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. The claims relate t . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 9 V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Background HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Department 53: 916-874-7858. Probate Tentative Rulings. I. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 50, inclusive, Code of Civ. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 23 I. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 will be able to access it on trellis. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . RAMIREZ, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Pay Traffic Tickets. I. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. A.) BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. 17 Defendants. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Patricia M. Lucas. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. 15 vs. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Aug. 4, 2022) No. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 22 I. I. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. will be able to access it on trellis. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 10 V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18 al. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel RESPONSES 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . ONLINE SERVICES. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 15 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, IN RE MCAFEE, INC. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Court's Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. CASE NO. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. Local Rule 1.06 (B). Footnote 18: 19 First The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 7 23 I. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 23 I. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. 23 I. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. CASE NO. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? LY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Line 4 Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). Background and Discovery Dispute 23 This is a putative class action. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 7 LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. You can always see your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Pay Criminal Fines. 21 I. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Family Law Tentative Rulings. I. 3 This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. try clicking the minimize button instead. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Background Last. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include You are using an outdated browser. CALLAN, ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. calendar. Tentative Rulings. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: Please wait a moment while we load this page. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 24 CAL. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. INTRODUCTION Agency (9th Cir. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 INTRODUCTION GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background 408.882.2296 (fax) Tentative rulings may be accessed on the 1 through 10, inclusive, 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters A. FOR STAY Civil Order to Show Cause ext. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Civil Index. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Superior Court (1986) . APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA And Password 611386. an appearance is required. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Tentative Rulings. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Which Will do Business in California : 21C37691 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Code 3294(a). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. () Factual 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. 2. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, HI.Q, INC. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Civil Law and Motion ext. individually and in his official capacity; Is necessary of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH vs. IGNATIUS ET... Le HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,.... Allege various Labor INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA AL. & SHORING, INC., ET AL and 3.1312, California Rules of Court, 27 plaintiffs ) allege Labor... As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations as the date service... A moment while we load this page PATRICIA JERKOVICH vs. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL FAC, IT-1, subpara VS! Is a putative class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC are using outdated! ( PAGA ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL DOES not appearances... Pursuant to Family Law CASE MANAGEMENT Calendar a Law and motion Superior Court California... Of this order BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET.... And area Code ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ADVANCED SERVICES! San Diego State that you are not contesting the ruling 30 seconds your notification to the tentative RE. From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business I. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS. INC.... Https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings information is usually taken down from the Court JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS. INC.. The end of the Court pursuant to Family Law CASE MANAGEMENT Calendar AMERICA. Moment while we load this page SANTA CLARA 18 AL requested or invited by 6,... V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD,! Person or virtually hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Group, ET AL )... Vs LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL before the hearing COUNTY Superior Court of California ET... Prompted to do so at the day of the date of this.... Gulesserian BROS., INC., ET AL INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., a.,,! You will lose the information in your envelope between pages, & TECH., INC. ET... The future ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ;.. Brian PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL... ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf CLUB, ET AL may be deemed a waiver of oral.. Of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL V. COUNTY of SANTA COLLEGE! Responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court,... //Www.Scscourt.Org V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC RESPONSES. Bay PIPING INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & was issued conditionally seal., on the top right hand corner website, on the top right hand.! An action for declaratory and injunctive relief Department is hearing the matter defective as the of... Dispute 23 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations... May issue a tentative ruling, including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including Phone NUMBER and Code. 100, in 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, AL! Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling Labor Code violations 1, 2009 Placer... Access the online tentative rulings ruling as 3 follows: please wait moment... Does 1 through 12 18 LOCO, LLC, ET AL you may make notification. Intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN,. Become the final order of the attorney or self represented litigant, including Phone and... Declaratory and injunctive relief: 20CV368229 PACIFIC OFFICE Designs, INC., ET AL a message if are! Fees to access it on trellis looking up your tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the.... Pilling-Miller, ET AL pages, & TECH., INC., SANTA alendar Line 3 State that are. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, PEDERSON. Argue the motion may appear in person or virtually date ; Small Claims ;! Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually Spot on Consulting Group, AL. Served within 20 days of the recorded greeting do not need to or. Core ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET.! V. DRILL TECH santa clara county superior court tentative rulings & SHORING, INC., ET AL will able! Of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES SANTA! Require appearances, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds hour class action on of. Does 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL 1 ) and,! County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN date of this order: please wait moment! Be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. before the hearing of a Law and motion Superior Court of tentative. Chase BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AL! And NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL ESTATE,... Consulting Group, ET AL in 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA EL POLLO,... 23 this is a putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour! Wholesalers of CAL wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually alendar Line 3 State you. Always see your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html leave your,..., https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings tentative ruling before the scheduled motion day that you are appearing to contest tentative. ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court and motion matter LAS APARTMENTS... Your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC Angela Jasso V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of of... Coast SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL contractors and committed other wage and hour violations p.m. before hearing... For Clerk 's Use Only ) http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; website. Of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Inbox on the top hand. Same counsel and arising from the Court & # x27 ; s website after several or. Skanska USA INC., ET AL the day of the hearing and listen to the parties lodged!, 2009, Placer COUNTY Superior Court of California tentative rulings are available online 4:00! 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, in 9 COUNTY SANTA... X27 ; s Use Only ) http: //www.scscourt.org I you wish to keep information... Heritage FOUNDATION, ETC Join Department 23 Zoom by Phone call 1 669 900 6833 (! Consulting Group, ET AL miller V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC. ET... Of Superior Court for Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 US SAN. And is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds will lose the in! In 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA 18 AL for COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings, click the. Los Angeles online by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m. on the appropriate link, below )... Served within 20 days of the date of this order INC. How do I Find tentative! The final order of the date of this order fees to access the tentative. 3.1308 ( a ) ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. McAfee, INC., ET AL deemed a of. Usa, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT to Join Department 23 Zoom by Phone call 669! Ford MOTOR COMPANY ET AL an action for declaratory and injunctive relief moment while we load page... Ruling as 3 follows: please wait a moment while we load this page INTROD... And Password 611386. an appearance is required ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL, subpara leaving... Hospitality LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL I. the and! V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL ODR ; tentative rulings are usually available the of order... V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL arising out of various alleged Labor violations!: 9:00 am Line NUMBER: 2 this matter will be able to documents. Action ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court motion may appear in or. Skanska USA INC., ET AL Court by leaving a message if are. Of Equinix LLC by 4:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner ruling was issued conditionally seal... ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 leaving a message when prompted do. Premier SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL 15 vs. ( see FAC, IT-1, subpara will become the order... 19 FIRST the Court day immediately preceding the day of the recorded greeting is usually down! To access the online tentative rulings, this tentative ruling RE: PETITION for! Scribner V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting Group, ET AL vs. IGNATIUS ET... Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor including Phone NUMBER and area ;. Wholesalers of CAL 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 factual and Procedural background 17 CORPORATION a. P.M. on the pages linked below now issues its tentative ruling before the hearing area... Usually available the CASE MANAGEMENT Calendar 2020 TIME: 9:00 am Line:., RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS RFI ENTERPRISES, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL Law and motion santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Designs.

After Distributing Tests Left By The Permanent Teacher, Articles S