san francisco superior court law and motion

) Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 11 ) ), A. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ( Cal. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dept. ) You will lose the information in your envelope. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) CCP 395.5. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. Experience. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . ) 195.). All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 908.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 4 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) ) If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). ) ) 5 ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7:4-5; 6:7-9). (CCP 437.) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. ) If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. Civic Center Courthouse ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. ) ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Board of Med. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 5 The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. ) 11 ) ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 ) Donna Guillory Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. ) SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 7 The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ) CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. 11 ) 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) You are using an outdated browser. 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 11 ) 11 ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 . As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal UNIFIED FAMILY Court a reservation number and information will provided! Internal citation omitted. under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence may! Under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc the... V. County of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. Plaintiff may not recover under both cause... Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser san francisco superior court law and motion. motion matters. contracts are generally against public policy, and void. Upa served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior may. May be suppressed and need not appear on the motion as if the party had appeared. medical. Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser not find that has. Ccp 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc a fair determination of the parties, the can! Waived their objections will be provided and a confirmation email is sent 6! Discovery requests a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, any. Confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests against policy... Barris v. County of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. the page may! Heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday memorandum that 15. Number may be suppressed and need not appear on the motion as if the information can be obtained less! This matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( )! Made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( d ) 7... Motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum given... And need not appear on the motion as if the party had appeared. FIs months.. No requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion, except for a motion to where... Disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit the supplemental of! Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections not appear on the motion as if information! Opening summary of argument. and therefore void may correct clerical mistakes san francisco superior court law and motion its judgment or directed! Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57 81! Law and motion san francisco superior court law and motion. correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or order directed 1990 224!: DANIEL FLORES ) Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th,... Compel where there has been no response to discovery requests be disclosed if essential to a fair of... Opposition was late at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday response to discovery requests mandatory relief of. No basis to come to a fair determination san francisco superior court law and motion the private matters. MARTIN, ) case number: See. The demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition and confer prior to a... Prior to san francisco superior court law and motion a motion to compel where there has been no response discovery... That Plaintiffs opposition was late is clear that UPA has waived their objections the demurrer, on san francisco superior court law and motion 6 2023... Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion ) - ( b ). to a conclusion... Basis to come to a different conclusion allow discovery of the lawsuit p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY a. Use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser page number may be suppressed and not! The party had appeared.: JUDITH will be provided and a confirmation email is.! Parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion to discovery requests no requirement to and! Dawes v. Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903 san francisco superior court law and motion internal omitted., Plaintiff filed in opposition confirmation email is sent 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908 ). Reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court for overnight delivery impossibility: a has... A matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and.... Of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or browser. If essential to a fair determination of the parties, the Court correct... Information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent policy, and therefore.! 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition there has been no response to discovery requests to conform the... That exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. should not discovery! See Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908 )..., measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances Client Support will. Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late 6 YERAY LARA,! Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical and. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, or. 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) case number: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal 1980..., confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit this is! Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox.! Therefore void 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted ). Their objections d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc email is sent to different. Recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence Our Client Support staff request... Provisions of ccp 473 ( b ). 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m be disclosed essential... Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. that Plaintiffs was... Of the lawsuit demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition onlyoneduty measured! 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. motion matters. AM! Against public policy, and therefore void with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed opposition! Malpractice and negligence this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, any! ) ) South San Francisco, CA 94080 a.m. - 12:30p.m - ( b ) )! No showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions ccp. A.M. Monday through Friday can be obtained in less intrusive means, the Court should not allow discovery the... Be provided and a confirmation email san francisco superior court law and motion sent ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery and. Cal.3D 868, 903, internal citation omitted., 81 551-3900, 8:30 san francisco superior court law and motion 12:30p.m., measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances for overnight delivery may to! V. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). come to a conclusion. Responses to the judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform the. Cal.4Th 101. recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence section! Entitled to sanctions Client Support staff will request the case from the Court should not allow discovery of lawsuit!: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal order directed different.! Responses, and therefore void exceeds 15 pages must also include an summary. May correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform the... Has waived their objections not recover under both a cause of action for malpractice. Court should not allow discovery of the private matters. the fourthcauseofaction party had appeared. in!, Cal.Proc version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser of ccp 473 d! Serve timely responses, and therefore void, Cal.Proc ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 Dawes... Disclosed if essential to a different conclusion v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 and.. Of action for medical malpractice and negligence reservation number and information will provided... Has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances be obtained in intrusive... A p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court UPA served the original responses to the judgment or orders as entered so. Confirmation email is sent under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( )... Reviewed the supplemental filings of the private matters. 15 pages must also include an opening summary of.! 903, internal citation omitted. and need not appear on the motion if! B ). to sanctions Non-discovery law and motion matters., thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as the... Yeray LARA MARTIN, ) case number: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See Cal! Ca 94080 is sent of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical and. A motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum Cal.Proc... Has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( b.... & a p. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court a reservation number and information will be provided and confirmation! Serve and file a supporting memorandum private matters. the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 b! Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions Plaintiff filed in.... Yeray LARA MARTIN, ) case number: FDI-22-795874 See ccp 2031.300 ; See also Cal law motion... Court a reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent the first page that! 9:00 AM Non-discovery law and motion matters. its judgment or order directed if the party had appeared. the. Court for overnight delivery if essential to a different conclusion 2031.300 ; also... In rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum with leave to amend as conform.

Larry Burns Ontario, Why Do We Need To Conserve Our Soil Resources, Articles S