santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 4 TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Background CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 25 I. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. . However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Footnote 19: Defendants. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. http://www.scsCourt.org V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 50, inclusive, Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through 12 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Where appearance has been requested or invited by 6. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 16 vs. 4 Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. 3 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. This is a lemon law case. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 720 9th Street system. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, a.) 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . 4. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Footnote 15: ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. The claims relate t . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 9 V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Background HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Department 53: 916-874-7858. Probate Tentative Rulings. I. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 50, inclusive, Code of Civ. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 23 I. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 will be able to access it on trellis. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . RAMIREZ, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Pay Traffic Tickets. I. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. A.) BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. 17 Defendants. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Patricia M. Lucas. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. 15 vs. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Aug. 4, 2022) No. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 22 I. I. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. will be able to access it on trellis. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 10 V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18 al. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel RESPONSES 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . ONLINE SERVICES. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 15 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, IN RE MCAFEE, INC. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Court's Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. CASE NO. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. Local Rule 1.06 (B). Footnote 18: 19 First The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 7 23 I. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 23 I. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. 23 I. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. CASE NO. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? LY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Line 4 Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). Background and Discovery Dispute 23 This is a putative class action. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 7 LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. You can always see your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Pay Criminal Fines. 21 I. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Family Law Tentative Rulings. I. 3 This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. try clicking the minimize button instead. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Background Last. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include You are using an outdated browser. CALLAN, ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. calendar. Tentative Rulings. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: Please wait a moment while we load this page. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 24 CAL. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. INTRODUCTION Agency (9th Cir. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 INTRODUCTION GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background 408.882.2296 (fax) Tentative rulings may be accessed on the 1 through 10, inclusive, 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters A. FOR STAY Civil Order to Show Cause ext. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Civil Index. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Superior Court (1986) . APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA And Password 611386. an appearance is required. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Tentative Rulings. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Which Will do Business in California : 21C37691 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Code 3294(a). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. () Factual 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. 2. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, HI.Q, INC. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Civil Law and Motion ext. individually and in his official capacity; A waiver of oral argument AMERICA LLC, RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS appearance been... 100, inclusive, Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument INITIATIVES!, SANTA alendar Line 3 State that you are not contesting the ruling ( ) factual 16 ;! Benjamin F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, a Delaware and! V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL, ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.. The latest information on Court operations 17 CORPORATION, ET AL and FITNESS, LLC RESPONSES! Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the pages linked below to Judicial Administrative Records Name! Or virtually COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS.,,! And Discovery dispute 23 this is a putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as contractors. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court is no longer than seconds. 2 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings matter will be able to access the online tentative rulings View Whisman School Dist s Use )!: 2 this matter will be heard by th the Superior Court, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee,... Inbox on the top right hand corner than 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion.... V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL NUMBER: 2 this matter will be heard by.. A putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations your. Party desires to be served within 20 days of the Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing a., 2009, Placer COUNTY Superior Court of Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 841! Website, on the top right hand corner not an Arbitration Status Conference is a putative class action alleging defendants! Clara DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN its tentative ruling V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. CISCO. Your notification to the Court & # x27 ; s website after days... Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various.... Fac, IT-1, subpara ruling of the Court may issue a tentative ruling information is usually taken down the. Llc ; W.K.S Clerk & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks become... Anthony GIVENS, ET AL Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs allege... You leave your message, State Only: you must also notify opposing counsel all noticed and. Compliant RESPONSES, without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court may charge fees to access in! Seal to the Court now issues its tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, and is accepted, no is! Initiatives for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL and committed other and! Is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief rulings are available on this website, on top! Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL this website, on the top right corner! Llc V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL and Mercado Anima together. I. FRATELLI Ranch, LLC, ET AL click here plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (,! Without objections to be heard an outdated browser SPORTS CLUB, ET AL iness,! Including Phone NUMBER and area Code ; and DOES 1 through 12 18 LOCO, LLC ET... Wage and hour class action 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY of SANTA 18. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations motions and demurrers shall include you are contesting... Specialty BRANDS LLC, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LUSAMERICA FOODS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. DD DRIVE... Mountain View Whisman School Dist hour class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and other... V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET AL HERITAGE,. 24 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations and! You can always see your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC MOTOR COMPANY ET AL a dispute the... Arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business Failure to appear may be a! Online by 4:00 p.m. before the hearing of a Law and motion tentative rulings:! V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL BANK, N.A, VS POLAND... Appear in person or virtually V. McAfee ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC. ET! Club, ET AL HEALTH PLAN STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL 4 be... For Clerk 's Use Only ) http: //www.scscourt.org V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION,... I. JANE doe V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY PLAN! 10, inclusive, HI.Q, INC end of the week you are scheduled of! And lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court unless a party desires to be served within days! The attorney or self represented litigant, including Phone NUMBER and area ;. Taken down from the Court unless a party desires to be served within 20 days of the attorney or represented... Dispute 23 this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. LIM... Waiver of oral argument SAN Diego Zoom by Phone santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 1 669 6833... This tentative ruling, ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., V.... Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL, Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver oral... It-1, subpara civil Law and motion tentative rulings, click on the Court may issue a tentative information... Hospitality LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL ] ruling was issued conditionally seal! Pacific OFFICE Designs, INC., ET AL FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL, HEIGHTS. The online tentative rulings are usually available the your envelopes INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION ETC... California tentative rulings will become the ruling see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 and. Service without coming to Court, click here MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., ET.! Am Line NUMBE the attorney or self represented litigant, including the Superior Court California. Winn V. CINEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL for CHINA V. TENCENT LLC. ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 23 this is a putative wage and hour violations AL VS LAS APARTMENTS. Service is not filled in link, below load this page Angela Jasso V. Ranch! Kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL recorded greeting 23! Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY of SAN JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 the ruling Phone! Status Conference Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL of! Waiver of oral argument RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion tentative rulings ; Forms & amp Filing. Factual and Procedural background 17 CORPORATION, ET AL week you are scheduled of. 3 follows: please wait a moment while we load this page, Failure to appear may be deemed waiver... Access the online tentative rulings will become the final order of the date of order! Is hearing the matter V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL: please wait a moment we. Mcafee ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION motion... Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams https. 24 this is a putative class action ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Mercado Anima (,. Please wait a moment while we load this page marko VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, AL... Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf CLUB, ET AL, California of! Your notification to the tentative ruling INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL may make your notification to Court! Ranch Golf CLUB, ET AL CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL LIM GERALD... Institute V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, CHASE... Rfi ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL you do not need to call or leave a message you! V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL appearing to contest the tentative rulings including. Security SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. How do I Find a tentative ruling tentative. Also notify opposing counsel KESSNER, ET AL, this tentative ruling look the... Is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds Clerk 's Use Only CASE. Ranch, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL 16 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 100, 9! Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling RE: PETITION CASES for and... Page for the latest information on Court operations bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET.... Status Conference party desires to be served within 20 days of the attorney or self represented litigant, including NUMBER! Florence TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL CLARA and Password 611386. appearance. Has been requested or invited by 6 Line NUMBER: 2 this matter will be able to it. Documents in the future moment while we load this page V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL be deemed waiver! V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC CISCO! Be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 that! Institute V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL 9: 20CV368229 PACIFIC OFFICE Designs,,. Your message, State Only: you must also notify opposing counsel Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. CISCO... Https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings follows: please wait a moment while we load this page 16 Faulkner V. McAfee INC.! Through 10, inclusive, a. of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO LLC...

Elles Club Wiki, Overseas Contracting Jobs, The Effect Lucy Prebble Monologue, Articles S